Pennsylvania lawmakers haven’t regulated or taxed "skill games," and now the sector is facing pressure due to a case currently in the state Supreme Court. (Photo: Keith Srakocic / Alamy)
So-called "skill games" have survived another year without facing regulation from lawmakers in Pennsylvania, but that doesn’t mean the slots-like machines are in the clear in the Keystone State.
Despite bipartisan support for legislation that would regulate skill games in the state, nothing about the issue was included in the Pennsylvania state budget passed on Nov. 12.
Currently, skill games sit in a sort of legal limbo in Pennsylvania. There are no taxes collected from them and no regulations on them, which has allowed them to be installed in gas stations, bars, and other locations across the state.
Multiple plans were brought forth in 2025 to change this status by officially regulating the machines and collecting tax revenue from them:
In the end, none of these plans have gone very far. Despite widespread agreement that something has to be done to oversee the skill games industry, Pennsylvania will head into 2026 without regulation on the machines.
“This building has a long history of going through gaming debates, and they are very complex and very tedious and very difficult,” State Senate Majority Leader Joe Pittman (R-Indiana) said earlier in November. “I certainly believe gaming reform is – and most be – an important policy initiative going forward.”
But even if legislators don’t make a definitive move on skill games, it’s possible that the courts could step in instead.
Currently, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court is considering a case to determine whether skill games should be classified as gambling devices. The Pennsylvania attorney general and Department of Revenue are appealing previous rulings that have found that such machines were not gambling devices.
Pace-O-Matic – a company that manufactures skill machines, has argued that because a second stage of their games allow players the ability to win on every spin, their games are legally distinct from slots and other gambling devices. However, the state disputes this distinction, as do many in the gaming industry.
“It is not enough for that component of the game to be considered predominant,” Susan Affronti, a lawyer from the attorney general’s office, told the court, arguing that chance still outweighs player control.
But Pace-O-Matic officials have pointed to a 2023 Commonwealth Court ruling – one the Supreme Court declined to review last year – which found that similar machines developed by Banilla Games were not considered gambling devices.
“The loophole that has been talking about in this case, it’s not a loophole. It’s the law,” Pace-O-Matic compliance officer Brian Langan said in testimony. “[Pace-O-Matic founder Michael Pace] was smart enough to design a machine to be in accordance with the law.”
Find the best fully legal live-dealer online casino games in Pennsylvania and around the US here.
Ed Scimia is an experienced writer who has been covering the gaming industry since 2008. He graduated from Syracuse University in 2003 with degrees in Magazine Journalism and Political Science. As a writer, Ed has worked for About.com, Gambling.com, and Covers.com, among other sites. He has also authored multiple books and enjoys curling competitively, which has led to him creating curling-related content for his YouTube channel, "Chess on Ice."
Read Full Bio




